Madras Agric. J., 98 (7-9): 282-285, September 2011
QuEChERS Method for Determination of Some Chlorinated Hydrocarbon and Synthetic Pyrethroid Residues in Sheep Meat by Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector M. Paramasivam*, R. Harischandra Naik and S. Chandrasekaran
Pesticide Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Entomology
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003
A rapid, simple and efficient multiresidue method was developed and optimized for the identification and quantification of organochlorine pesticides (OCP) and synthetic pyrethroids (SPs) in sheep meat samples. The method consists of a modified Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation method. Samples were extracted with acetonitrile, and the extracts were cleaned up by dispersive solid phase extraction with primary secondary amine (PSA) sorbent and anhydrous magnesium sulphate. Determination and quantification of OCP residues was carried out using a GC-ECD. Mean recoveries were found in the ranges 70-110 % and 84-99 % for the investigated OCPs and SPs, respectively, with the RSD was less than 20%. This method was found more efficient and reliable enabling more number of samples to be analysed in less time. Moreover lipid removal was achieved to a large extent to get desired result. Keywords: QuEChERS, Multiresidue analysis, Sheep meat, Chlorinated hydrocarbons, Synthetic
Sheep meat is contaminated with pesticides in
tissues are based on an extraction step with ethyl
feed, water and during exposure of animals to pest
acetate (Muhammad et al., 2010), acetone (Barbini
control activity directly or indirectly. Biological activity
et al., 2007) and hexane-acetonitrile (Darko and
of pesticides is not only restricted to the target
Acquaah, 2007) followed by partition and clean-up
organisms but also extends to non targets animals
in order to remove the fatty interference, followed by
(Singh and Dhaliwal, 1993). In India for crop
a gas chromatographic determination with electron
protection, the usage of organochlorines, particularly,
capture or mass spectrometry detection (GC-ECD,
cyclodienes are banned but restricted use of these
chemicals is allowed in the case of public health
Unlike many earlier pesticide residue analysis
programme, especially malaria control programme.
methods developed for traditional chromatographic
Pyrethroids have been used widely throughout the
detection systems (e.g. Ultra Violet/vis absorbance,
world for insect control in agriculture and to combat
fluorescence, element-selective detectors), the
human and animal parasites (Mastovska et al.,
QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged
2006). Pesticides used for cattle disease control
and Safe) approach takes advantage of the wide
can affect public health and international trading of
analytical scope and high degree of selectivity and
food products, if maximum residue levels (MRL) are
above those stipulated by FAO and WHO.
chromatography (GC and LC) coupled. GC, GC-MS
Chlorinated hydrocarbons have low acute toxicity
but possess greater potentials for causing chronic
Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) have become the main
toxicity due to liphophilic nature. The OCP residues
analytical tools in most pesticide monitoring
in poultry egg samples varied from BDL to 0.031 µg/g
laboratories to meet world standards. Thus the
(Suganthy et al., 2009). Pesticide residues
streamlined features, practical benefits and excellent
accumulating in the tissues of animals lead to bio-
accumulation in different levels and ultimately to
preparation approach lead to the great popularity of
biomagnification. Government of India and
QuEChERS concept (Anastassiades et al., 2003,
Directorate of Plant Protection and Quarantine in
Lehotay et al., 2010). The QuEChERS has been
the year 2008, banned diclofenac, a veterinary drug
applied with success on several food matrices such
due to hazards biocidal nature to folken birds.
as fruits and vegetables (Anastassiades et al.,
The most commonly reported methods for the
2003,) and low-fatty (2-20%) food matrices, such as
analysis of pesticide residues in meat and animal
milk, egg, and avocado (Lehotay et al., 2005).
*Corresponding author email: [email protected]
In fat samples, conventional methods for the
market. The meat sample (1 kg) was blended with
analysis of pesticide residues usually involve
high volume blade homogeniser and used for the
laborious and time-consuming clean-up steps.
Moreover, analytical problems associated with lipids
Recovery studies
extraction when using gas chromatographic system,especially electron capture detector, due to matrix
interferences, may cause signal suppression or
sample was mixed with a known amount of OCPs
enhancement. In multi-residue analysis, the sample
and SPs mixture in a 50ml polypropylene centre
preparation process cannot be selective to remove
fuge tube. In controlled sample, same amount of
chemical compounds of the matrix if they have
hexane was added. Both tubes were kept for 30
similar properties as the analytes. Modifications of
minutes to allow the pesticide standard reference
materials to get imbibed in to the ground meat.
solvents, salt volumes, and clean-up sorbents. The
Extraction and cleanup
aim of the study was to develop a simple and efficientmultiresidue analysis in sheep meat. In order to
The extraction of pesticide residue from meat
shorten the analytical procedure during extraction
sample was followed by QuEChERS method with
modification (Anastassiades et.al. 2003). An aliquotof 10 g. of homogenised sample was weighed in to
Materials and Methods
a 50 ml of polypropylene centrifuge tube and 20 ml
Chemicals
of acetonitrile was added and hand shakenimmediately for 2 minutes. Four grams of anhydrous
Acetone, acetonitrile, and hexane of HPLC grade,
magnesium sulphate and 1 g. of sodium chloride
anhydrous magnesium sulphate, sodium chloride
were further added and shaken immediately for 30
of analytical grade all from M/s. Merck (Mumbai,
seconds with the closed screw cap. The mixture
India), primary secondary amine (PSA) from M/s.
was then centrifuged at about 10000 rpm for 10
minutes using a centrifuge (Plasto Craft®) to
Preparation of standards
separate the sediments and water from acetonitrile. Next the 4 ml (equivalent to the 2 g.of sample) of
supernatant of acetonitrile layer obtained after
Accustandard; Inc, (New Haven, CT06513, USA).
salting out was loaded in to a 15 ml centrifuge tube
Each insecticide was dissolved in hexane to make
containing 100 mg of primary secondary amine and
a 1000 µg/g stock standard solution. Intermediate
and working standard solutions were prepared from
immediately followed by the centrifugation at about
stock solution by serial dilution technique. Five
5000 rpm at 5 minutes . After centrifugation, 2 ml of
working standard solutions ranging from 0.01, 0.05,
supernatant was taken out in to the turbovap tube
0.1, 0.5, and 1 µg/g were prepared from standard
and concentrated to dryness by using the Turbovap
mixture for a linearity check. Spiking solutions were
evaporator (Caliper Life Sciences, Russelsheim,
used for fortifying the sample and also for the
Germany) at 40°C with a gentle stream of nitrogen
calculation after appropriate dilution. All the solutions
and the residues were redissolved in 1 ml of hexane
were protected against light with aluminium foil and
and subsequently filtered through membrane filter
paper to remove the excess of colouring materials
Instrumental parameters
and transferred in to GC vials. The concentration ofsample represented by the test solution was 1g/ml.
A GC-2010 (Shimadzu, Japan), equipped with
The detection and quantification was carried out by
ECD with 63Ni radio isotope 370 MBQ (10mci) as
source of detector in gas chromatography. Capillaryfussed silica column (J&W, scientific, USA), DB-5,
Results and Discussion
30m X 0.25 mm id X 0.25 µm film thickness. Carrier
In the present work, the QuEChERS method was
gas: nitrogen 2.0 ml/min (constant flow mode), make
followed to extract the pesticide residues from the
up gas-nitrogen; Injector temperature 250°C and
sheep meat. This approach can significantly reduce
the analysis time and solvent consumption.
The GC column oven was initially set at a
Anastassiades et al., (2003) reported a QuEChERS
temperature of 160° C for 1 min, increased @ 3°C /
method of pesticide extraction by using acetonitrile
min to 200°C, held for 2 min and increased @ 4°C
as a vortex mixture, the cleanup procedure was
/ min to 220°C held for 4 min finally increased @
performed by dispersive solid phase extraction
5°C / min to 250°C held for 15 min. Split injection at
using the primary secondary amine and finally the
a volume of 1 µl by Shimadzu AOC 20i auto injector
extract was injected in to GC-ECD system. Electron
capture detector was found to be fairly sensitive toall selected pesticides under standardised GC-
Sample preparation
ECD parameters. Blank as well as control sample
Meat samples were collected from the local
did not show any peak that could be attributed to the
Table 1. Average recovery and relative standard
Table 1 and 2 show recoveries and relative
deviation of chlorinated hydrocarbon from sheep
standard deviation (RSD) values obtained for spiked
meat samples by modified QuEChERS method
samples at spiking level. These values evidencedthat the method achieved acceptable recoveries for
all pesticides (70-120%), with RSD lower than 15%.
Most pesticides gave 70-120% acceptablerecoveries with associated RSD<15%, therefore
developed method may be used as a quantitative
More lipophilic pesticides (alpha HCH, delta
HCH, aldrin, and dieldrin) gave recoveries of 70-80
% (Table 1) and reasonably consistent (RSD<10%).
Lower recoveries were unavoidable in some
pesticides for the satisfactory chromatographic
performance, as well to remove co-extractive fats.
Consistent recoveries and accurate quantitation of
most lipophilic residues will require either the use
of an internal standard matched closely to the
lipophilic analytes, the use of an extracted matrix-
matched calibration or to correct the results for the
Table 2. Average recovery and relative standard deviation of synthetic pyrethroids from sheep meat samples by modified QuEChERS method
* Means of three replication, SD- standard deviation, RSD-Relative standard deviation
studies of pesticides. All the pesticides gave well
resolved peaks. However, permethrin, beta-
cyfluthrin, fenvalerate and deltamethrin gave twopeaks due to separation of isomers and the mean
of their two peakes was used to calculation. The
linearity range of multiresidue pesticides was
worked out by plotting the response against a
standard and ranged from 0.01 to 1 µg / g.
Selection and optimization of extraction and
cleanup procedure are very important in multiresidue
analysis. The extraction of pesticide residue
depends upon the polarity of the pesticides as well
as the type of pesticide matrix. Owing to the wide
range of polarity and solubility exhibited by the
* Means of three replication, SD- standard deviation, RSD-Relative standard deviation
compounds investigated, acetonitrile was selectedas one of the solvents for extraction of pesticides
Among synthetic pyrethroids, alpha cypermethrin
because of its effectiveness of polar and non polar
(74.40%) recorded the lowest recovery value of 74.40
pesticides from the diverse range of matrices. The
% and deltamthrin I recorded the highest value of
clean up step was modified by the addition of 100mg
110.23 %.Fenpropathrin (76.28), lambda cyhalothrin
PSA to the remaining fats. The added PSA effectively
(78.93%),permethrin I (91.34%), permethrin II
removed many polar matrix components, such as
(95.32%), beta cyfluthrin I (81.65%), beta cyfluthrin
organic acids, certain polar pigments, and sugars,
II (82.50%), fenvalerate I (85.53%), fenvalerate II
from the food extracts. The co-extractives in the
(100.77%), and deltamethrin II (77.73%) showed
extract, because of insufficient cleanup of sample
acceptable range of recovery values. Analytical
cause rapid deterioration of gas chromatographic
problems associated with the presence of lipids
system especially electron capture detector, thereby
were not observed in spiked samples after the
precluding reliable results. In the QuEChERS
analysis of routine sequences: Retention time drifted
method originally used for pesticide extraction, 10
about 0.1% and response drifted lower than 30% at
ml of acetonitrile was added to 10 g. of sample
followed by addition of magnesium sulphate and
Detector was found quite sensitive not only for
salting out step to remove water and PSA to bind
organochlorine but also synthetic pyrethriods. The
with organic acids polar colouring material or
limit of detection (LOD) of the method was worked
glucosides. The sample matrix was less disturbed
out based on the signal to noise ratio of 1:3 and
when using primary secondary amines which
limit of quantification (LOQ) based on 1:10 ratio.
ECD was found to be fairly sensitive for all the 24
pesticides under standardised GC parameters all
determination of the residues of four pyrethroids in
the pesticides gave well resolved peaks. The
meat by GC-ECD and confirmation by GC-MS. Anal.
QuEChERS method takes the advantage of several
Bioanal. Chem.,389: 1791-1798.
features of acetonitrile to provide a rather selective
Darko, G. and Acquaah, S.O. 2007. Levels of organo
isolation of pesticide residue over a wide polarity
chlorine pesticides residues in meat. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4: 521-524.
Lehotay, S.J., Kyung, A. S., Hyeyoung. K., Urairat, K.C.,
The proposed method is sensitive, quick, easy,
Wusheng. F., Katerina, M., Eunha, H. and Natchanun,
and allows the multiresidue determination of 24
representative pesticides including OCPs and SPs
preparation methods for the analysis of pesticide
pesticides in fat samples, with recoveries ranging
residues in fruits and vegetables. J. Chromo. A., 1217: 2548-2560.
from 70% to 120% for most of them with theoptimized conditions. The proposed method shows
Lehotay, S.J., Mastovska, K. and Yun, S.J. 2005. Evaluation
of two fast and easy methods for pesticide residue
good sensitivity and recovery and allows for rapid
analysis in fatty food matrices. J. AOAC Int., 88:
analysis. This method requires only small volumes
of solvents per sample and needs no special
Mastovska, K. and Lehotay, S.J. 2006. Rapid sample
equipments. Thereby, this method could be used
preparation method for LC/MS/MS or GC/MS analysis
for routine analysis in laboratories for national and
of acrylamide in various food matrices. J. Agric.
community monitoring programs of different
Food Chem., 54: 7001-7008.
families of pesticides in animal fat with equipment
Muhammad, F., Akhtar, M., Rahman, Z.U., Farooq, H.U.,
that allows quantitation and confirmation in one
Khaliq, T. and Anwar, M.I. 2010. Multi-residue
determination of pesticides in the meat of cattle inFaisalabad-Pakistan. Egyptian Acad. J. Biol. Sci.,References 2: 19-28.
Anastassiades, M., Lehotay, S.J., Stajnbaher, D. and
Singh, B. and Dhaliwal, G.S. 1993. Pesticide contamination
Schenck, F.J. 2003. Fast and easy multiresidue
of fatty foods in developing countries. In: Dhaliwal,
method employing acetonitrile extraction / partitioning
G.S. and Singh (Eds), Pesticides: Their Ecological
and "Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction" for the
Impact in Developing Countries. Commonwealth
determination of pesticide residues in produce, J.AOAC Int.,86:412-431.
Suganthy, M., Kuttalam, S. and Chandrasekaran, S. 2009.
Barbini, D.A., Vanni, F., Girolimetti, S. and Dommarco, R.
Monitoring of chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides
2007. Development of an analytical method for the
and chlorpyriphos residues in market samples of egg. Madras Agric. J.,96: 396-397.
Received: August 12, 2011; Accepted: September 15, 2011
Original Research: Perioperative adverse airway events in cleft lip and palate repair Perioperative adverse airway events in cleft lip and palate repair aAdenekan AT, MBBS, DA, FWACS aFaponle AF, MBChB, FWACS, FMCA bOginni FO, BChD, FMCDS, FWACS Departments of aAnaesthesia and Intensive Care and bOral and Maxil ofacial Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife,