Research your committee: In order to understand what issues your committee is authorized to debate and
what ideas it can implement, you should start by researching the background of the committee itself. Knowing the purpose, powers, membership, procedure, and structure of a committee will allow you
to best simulate your country within the committee. Consider when and why was your committee
founded? What are its established powers? How many members does your committee have and
who are they? How does your committee vote? Does your committee have sub-committees or report to a larger U.N body? What is the role of your committee in the entire U.N. organization?
Make sure that you understand the UN system, as the measures that certain committees are very
strictly regulated. For example, the General Assembly’s resolutions to the Security Council are only
recommendations for international action; it cannot mandate such actions itself. The Security Council, however, can enforce its decisions.
Research your country: Learning about your country begins with researching general information, like
what type of government your country has, its religion, and its economic structure. You should also look at more specific information. Find out about the primary issues affecting present-day society.
What about its past? What issues have influenced the status of your country today? Was it a former
colony? Has it undergone a political or social revolution? In all your research, keep an eye out to
determine what factors hold the greatest influence in shaping your country’s policies on the topic at hand. A thorough understanding of these points will enable you to reason out your country’s stance
on any issue that may arise, even if you haven’t explicitly researched it. In addition to reading various
country profiles from established think tanks and government agencies, be sure to stay up to date on
the current events happening in your country. Research your topic: The first step to researching your topic is to understand the problem. Ask yourself:
What are the main facets of the issue? What are the points of debate? Why are those points
contentious? Start by researching the issues broadly (even using Wikipedia as jumping off point is fine, as long as you do not then cite it in your position papers), and then proceed to your
committee’s website or other general resource. Read news articles, talk to friends and teachers who
may be knowledgeable about the issue to learn as much as you can. As a general strategy, look at the
bibliographies of various articles that you read; often, they provide precisely the topic-specific information you are looking for.
Make sure you start by reading the topic guides on the YMUN website. Your dais staff has
worked hard to explain the issue so that you may best be able to understand and debate it. Pay particular attention to the “Questions To Consider” at the end of each topic section and make sure
that your research addresses these questions. The “Suggestions for Further Research” and
“Citations” sections are also invaluable resources.
Once you have an adequate understanding of the problem at hand, begin to brainstorm
solutions to the problem. Consider the pros and cons of each. Look at examples of past actions
(e.g. U.N. resolutions, government programs, other multilateral actions) and analyze their successes
and failures. One very useful source can be the website of your country’s regional body, which in many cases has dealt with the exact same issues but in a more targeted manner. The regional
website can even improve your understanding of your country’s own policy, especially in situations
when your country seems to be indifferent about an issue. Another source of solutions can be the
websites of various non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Although the information they present often supports a very specific policy position, it can be very useful to help you understand
how others have proposed solving the problem. Many notable think tanks and NGOs put out
reports with policy recommendations to a given problem. These policy recommendations can help
Be sure to compare your ideas to your country’s policy to determine a viable course of action
that your country would support. Here is where all of your research will coalesce. Given what you
know about your country, figure out which policy options it would support, and equally as importantly, which it would explicitly oppose. Look at your country’s voting record in the UN and
other bodies. Understand the reasons for your country’s stance to help you convince others to
follow suit. Note that not all countries will have an explicit policy for every topic. It is up to you to
extrapolate from past actions and draw inferences from your country’s stance on other issues and its relations with other countries.
If you have any further questions about research, please contact your dais staff. They would
• UN Member States www.un.org/en/members/index.shtml • UN General Assembly www.un.org/en/ga/ • UN Economic and Social Council www.un.org/en/ecosoc/ • UN Security Council www.un.org/en/sc/ • UN Charter www.un.org/en/ecosoc/
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ • UN Document Center www.un.org/en/documents/index.shtml • Your committee’s website
• CIA World Factbook www.cia.gov/library/publications/the‐world‐factbook/
• State Department Background Notes www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/index.htm • Library of Congress Country Profiles lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/profiles.html • Kidon Media‐Link Foreign Newspapers www.kidon.com/media‐link/index.php
• United Nations Issues Page www.un.org/en/globalissues/
• United Nations Mil ennium Development Goals www.un.org/mil enniumgoals/ • Global Policy Forum www.globalpolicy.org/ • New York Times “Topics” www.nytimes.com/pages/topics/ • Economist Topics Index www.economist.com/topics
• The New York Times www.nytimes.com • BBC www.bbc.co.uk • The Times of London www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/ • The Wal Street Journal www.wsj.com • Financial Times www.ft.com • The Economist www.ft.com • The Washington Post www.washingtonpost.com • Foreign Affairs www.foreignaffairs.com • Foreign Policy www.foreignpolicy.com
• Brookings Institute www.brookings.edu/ • Chatham House, Royal Institute of International Affairs www.chathamhouse.org • Council on Foreign Relations: www.cfr.org • Carnegie Endowment for International Peace www.carnegieendowment.org • Center for Strategic and International Studies www.csis.org • Rand Corporation www.rand.org • International Crisis Group: www.crisisgroup.org • Peterson Institute for International Economics www.i e.com • International Institute for Strategic Studies www.i ss.org • Heritage Foundation www.heritage.org • Cato Institute: www.cato.org • American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research: www.aei.org • Center for American Progress: www.americanprogress.org • United States Institute for Peace: www.usip.org • Atlantic Council www.acus.org • Global Policy Forum www.globalpolicy.org • International Relations Security Network www.isn.ethz.ch/isn/
• Amnesty International www.amnesty.org
• Bil and Melinda Gates Foundation www.gatesfoundation.org • Human Rights Watch www.hrw.org • Ford Foundation www.fordfound.org • Transparency International www.transparency.org • Debt AIDS Trade Africa (DATA) www.data.org • Council for a Community of Democracies www.ccd21.org • Human Rights Watch www.hrw.org
• International Committee of the Red Cross www.icrc.org • Doctors Without Borders www.doctorswithoutborders.org
• United Nations Associations of the United States of America
• United Nations Cyberschoolbus www.un.org/cyberschoolbus/modelun/index.asp
• Best Delegate www.bestdelegate.org
Azilect nyhetsbrev nr 3 Vel overstått sommerferie! “Treatment decisions in newly diagnosed Parkinson’s disease” Vel tilbake på arbeid venter pasienter, kolleger og legemiddelindustrien på din tid betydningsfull i kraft av din kompetanse og hos den enkelte pasient er så forskjellig, Det er selvfølgelig individuelt, men noen bør man tenke på ved valg
Correlation of Subepithelial Haze and Refractive Regression 1 Month After Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia Dimitrios S. Siganos, MD; Vikentia J. Katsanevaki, MD; Ioannis G. Pallikaris, MD after PRK for myopia is strongly related to regres- ABSTRACT sion of initial refractive effect and increasing PURPOSE: To relate myopic regression after myopia. [ J Refract Surg 1999;15:3