Microsoft powerpoint - 08-243_sevinsky_icaac_poster.ppt
Effect of Efavirenz on the Pharmacokinetics of Ethinyl Estradiol and Norgestimate in Healthy Female Subjects
H. Sevinsky, T. Eley, B. He, A. Persson, D. Garner, C. Yones, R. Nettles, R. Bertz and J. Zhang
Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Princeton, NJ USA
Introducti Introducti on Results (Cont’d) Results (Cont’d) Results (Cont’d)
Efavirenz (EFV) is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that is used in
Pharmacokinetics Table 1. Statistical Analyses for EE PK Parameters
the treatment of HIV-1 infection. It is an inducer of CYP3A4 and uridine-diphosphate
Table 3. Statistical Analyses for LNG PK Parameters
glucuronosyl transferases (UGTs) in vivo.1,2,3 EFV is a Pregnancy Category D drug.
Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours post-dose on Days 14, 42 and 70 for
EE PK analysis, Days 42 and 70 for NGMN PK analysis and on Day 70 for EFV PK
Adjusted Geometric Means GMR (90% CI) Table 5. Safety Results
Preventing pregnancy is critical in women receiving EFV as part of their antiretroviral
Treatment (EE Dose) Adjusted Geometric Means GMR (90% CI) Treatment
– Non-compartmental analysis using the validated program Kinetica™:
Ortho Tri- Treatment
Oral contraceptives (OC) containing an estrogen (ethinyl estradiol, EE) and a progestin are
Cyclen LO Ortho Cyclen +
among the most frequently used methods of birth control
EE, NGMN and EFV Cmax, Tmax, AUC(TAU) and Cmin (concentration 24 hours post-
EFV / Ortho Ortho Tri- (0.025 mg) (0.035 mg) (0.035 mg) EFV / Ortho Tri-Cyclen Ortho Cyclen Ortho Cyclen + EFV EFV / Ortho Cyclen LO
In a previous study, EFV 400 mg increased the single dose EE Cmax and AUC by 5% and
Parameter PK Parameter 0.20 (0.17, 0.23)
EE is metabolized by sulfotransferases (SULTs), CYP3A4 and UGTs.4 The specific
– EE: standard curve from 10 - 500 pg/mL, QC deviations within ± 1.6%
(0.95, 1.19)
enzymes involved in progestin metabolism have not been well-defined; however CYP3A4
– NGMN: standard curve from 99.5 - 4975 pg/mL, QC deviations within ± 2.5%
AUC(TAU)
5,6 Exposure to OC components could potentially be impacted
AUC(TAU)
– EFV: standard curve from 10 - 10,000 ng/mL, QC deviations within ± 11.2%
(pg•h/mL) (0.80, 1.01) 0.17 (0.13, 0.21) Most Frequent AEs - N(%) of subjects (pg•h/mL)
– LNG: standard curve from 100 - 10,000 pg/mL, QC deviations within ± 0.5%
(0.75, 1.14)
The US Prescribing Information for Sustiva includes the fol owing information and
recommendation: The potential interaction of EFV with OCs has not been ful y
Pharmacodynamics 0.14 (0.10, 0.20)
characterized. A reliable method of barrier contraception should be used in addition to oral
* comparisons are 0.035 mg EE + EFV relative to 0.025 mg EE in the absence of EFV
Serum progesterone levels were determined at Day -2 and during each treatment (Study
AEs: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = very severe
Day 18, 46 and 74) as a biomarker for possible ovulation
EFV does not impact EE exposures when co-administered with Ortho Cyclen
One (1) SAE of suicide attempt was reported during the post-treatment follow-up period,
Progesterone is an endogenous hormone that peaks 5 - 9 days after ovulation; in women
Statistics
B = Ortho Cyclen, C = Ortho Cyclen + EFV 600 mg
considered probably related to study drug. Subject had a history of prior psychiatric
taking OCs, ovulation is suppressed and progesterone levels typically remain below
Progestins
hospitalization and medication for depression, not disclosed at screening
The effect of EFV on the PK of EE, NGMN and LNG were assessed by point estimates and
Most AEs were mild to moderate in intensity. Three (3) severe AEs in 3 subjects
90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for EE, NGMN, and
Figure 3. Mean Plasma Concentration versus Time Profiles for NGMN
NGMN and LNG exposures were markedly decreased in the presence of EFV
(headache, anhedonia and severe depressed mood) were reported and considered
This study was conducted in order to provide a better understanding of the interaction
LNG Cmax, AUC(TAU) and Cmin, derived using general linear models on log-transformed
EE 0.035 mg + NGM 0.25 mg QHS + EFV 600 mg QHS (N = 21)
One (1) subject had AST and ALT laboratory abnormalities that were AEs and considered
Differences in endogenous progesterone levels between treatments and their
Objectives Objectives
corresponding 95% CIs were estimated. These estimates were constructed using general
Efavirenz Figure 5. Scatter Plot of EFV AUC(TAU): Administered Alone in Women Discussion Discussion Primary:
(historical data) and Coadministered with Ortho Cyclen
In a previous study that resulted in increased single dose EE exposures when
To determine the effect of coadministration of EFV 600 mg on the pharmacokinetics (PK)
administered with EFV 400 mg, EFV was administered for only 7 days. The ability of
of EE and norelgestromin (NGMN), an active metabolite of the progestin norgestimate
EFV to induce CYP3A4 may not have been fully observed
Demographics Secondary:
In the current study, EFV 600 mg was dosed for 14 days with no observed impact on
28 women were enrol ed and treated, 19 subjects completed the study
EE PK. The effect of EFV on EE PK potentially involves inhibition/induction of
To characterize the PK of EFV when coadministered with the OC Ortho Cyclen®
multiple metabolic pathways, resulting in no net change in EE exposure
To assess the effect of EFV coadministered with Ortho Cyclen on serum progesterone
Decreases in NGMN and LNG exposures are potentially due to induction of CYP3A4
– 2 due to poor adherence, 1 due to positive drug screen, 5 withdrew consent
To assess the safety of EFV coadministered with Ortho Cyclen
Mean age (range): 28 years (18 - 42 years)
Progesterone levels remained suppressed (<10 ng/mL) when EFV was
An exploratory analysis of the PK of levonorgestrel (LNG), an active metabolite of NGMN
Table 2. Statistical Analyses for NGMN PK Parameters
coadministered with OCs; however these levels were assessed at a single time point
and an active component of some OCs, was conducted in a subset of 6 subjects
within the cycle and should be interpreted with caution
68% were White, 21% were Black, 4% were native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
Adjusted Geometric Means GMR (90% CI) Treatment Ortho Cyclen + EFV 600 mg EFV 600 mg Ortho Cyclen Ortho Cyclen + EFV EFV / Ortho QD (historical QD + Ortho PK Parameter 0.54 (0.48, 0.61)
EFV exposures after coadministration with Ortho Cyclen are comparable to EFV
EFV does not alter EE exposure when coadministered with Ortho Cyclen
Study Design Pharmacokinetics Ethinyl Estradiol AUC(TAU)
EFV significantly reduces exposure to NGMN and LNG when coadministered with
Open-label, 3-period, 4-treatment single sequence study in healthy female subjects who
0.36 (0.33, 0.38) (pg•h/mL)
had been receiving a stable regimen of OC for at least 2 months
Figure 2. Mean (SD) plasma concentration versus time profiles for EE 0.18 (0.15, 0.21)
EFV exposures after coadministration of Ortho Cyclen with EFV are comparable to
Figure 1. Study Design Pharmacodynamics
historical data in women when EFV 600 mg is administered alone
EE 0.035 mg + NGM 0.25 mg QHS + EFV 600 mg QHS (N = 21)
Table 4. Statistical Analyses for Progesterone Levels
AEs reported with Ortho Cyclen + EFV are not unexpected and consistent with those
Days 1-28 Days 29-56 Days 57-77 Adjusted Difference in Adjusted Means
These results reinforce the need for reliable methods of barrier contraception when
Figure 4. Mean Plasma Concentration versus Time Profiles for LNG Treatment Mean (ng/dL) Difference Point Estimates (90% CI) Treatment C A: Ortho Tri-Cyclen Treatment A Treatment B
EE 0.035 mg + NGM 0.25 mg QHS + EFV 600 mg QHS (N = 6)
B: Ortho Cyclen Treatment D References References D: Ortho Cyclen (3 days after EFV coad.)
1. Sustiva® (efavirenz) capsule and tablets. US prescribing information.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Princeton, NJ 2008. In-house: In-house: In-house:
A = Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO (day 18), B = Ortho Cyclen (day 46), D = Ortho Cyclen (day 74, 3
Days 13-15 Days 41-43 and 56 Days 57-77
days after completing Ortho Cyclen + EFV)
2. Isentress™ (raltegravir) tablets. US prescribing information.
Merck and Co., Inc. Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2008.
Single time point progesterone levels after coadministration of Ortho Cyclen and EFV 600
3. Noxafil® (posaconazole) oral suspension. US prescribing information.
Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO: Phase I = 0.025 mg EE + 0.18 mg NGM, Phase II = 0.025 mg
mg are similar to those after administration of Ortho Cyclen alone.
Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, 2008.
EE + 0.215 mg NGM, Phase III = 0.025 mg EE + 0.25 mg NGM
All subjects’ progesterone levels col ected at a single time point during 1 cycle on EFV +
4. Doose DR, Wang SS, Padmanabhan M, et al. Epilepsia 2003; 44(4): 540 - 549. Ortho Cyclen: 0.025 mg EE + 0.25 mg NGM
Ortho-Cyclen were less than 125 ng/dL, below the 1000 ng/dL indicative of ovulation
5. Hammomd GL, Abrams LS, Creasy GW, et al. Contraception 2003; 67(2): 93 - 99.
Follow up visits were conducted on Day 85 ± 2 days and Day 108 ± 2 days for pregnancy
Note: mean profile for Treatment A (Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO) is not shown
6. Kuhn W, Blode H and Mahler M. Contraception 1994; 49: 225 - 263.
testing and adverse event (AE) fol ow up. 48th Annual ICAAC/IDSA 46th Annual Meeting, October 25-28, 2008, Washington, DC
Herausgeber Österreichische Vereinigung für gewerblichen RechtsschutzRedaktion und Schriftleitung Lothar Wiltschek, Helmut Gamerith,Werbung oder Noch-nicht-Werbung?Walter Brugger £ 52Nokia/Philips, Nokia Martin Reinisch £ 55Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp vs DPMA Adolf Zemann £ 56Schnellstarterprämien – Keine Beden-ken gegen die Verfassungsmäßigkeitdes § 9 a Abs 1 Z 2 UWGIvo Rungg/Mar