GRUPO 4 – TIPO B Língua Inglesa Questões de 01 a 06 Read the text carefully. Then complete the activities according to it. Will Climate Go Over The Edge?
Even a miracle of diplomacy wouldn't put global warming back in its box.
Fred Guterl NEWSWEEK From the magazine issue dated Mar 2, 2009
There is something compelling, in a ghoulish sort of way, about the notion that
earth's climate may be headed toward a tipping point. The idea gained broad currency in
2007, when a panel of scientists, including Harvard environmental expert John Holdren—
now the White House science adviser—warned that the planet is approaching a threshold
beyond which damage to the environment would be irreversible. As policymakers work
toward a climate treaty in Copenhagen in December that will include new limits on
emissions, the question in the back of everyone's mind is whether an agreement can halt
the warming trend, or at least stave off the worst consequences. Or is it already too late? A
definitive answer isn't forthcoming, but the signs in recent months have been gloomy.
The truth is shrouded by a big scientific unknown: how quickly does climate
respond to changes in carbon levels? After 30 years of research, the link between the two
is still imprecise. That's why temperature trends are expressed within wide confidence
intervals. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the U.N. group, puts
the odds at two in three that a doubling of carbon levels in the atmosphere from pre-
industrial levels would raise average temperatures anywhere from 2 degrees C to 4.5
degrees C. The difference between the top and bottom of this range, according to the 2007
report, spells the difference between bad and catastrophic. (Some scientists believe, for
instance, that crop yields decline 10 percent for each degree rise in temperature.) Where
future generations wind up on the scale—or even if they fall on the scale at all—is still a roll
Empirical evidence is worrying, but not particularly enlightening. Melting glaciers,
changing bird-migration patterns and other observations suggest that warming is
proceeding at a pace that may exceed past estimates—in other words, we may be heading
toward the top of the IPCC forecast. But they don't tell us much about natural variability.
Arctic sea ice, for instance, is clearly shrinking faster than the climate-change computers
predicted. How much is due to carbon and how much would the ice have retreated
anyway? There's too little data to know—comprehensive records on Arctic sea ice go back
only to 1979. "The most likely bet is that the acceleration is due to greenhouse warming,"
says David Battisti, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Washington in Seattle. "But
I'd be nervous about making that bet. To know for certain we'd want a couple hundred
years of data. We have 30 years of really good data."
Since the real world is so messy, climate scientists Gerard Roe and Marcia Baker
turned for insight to the distinctly neater world of mathematics. Last year, they published an
analysis in the journal Science arguing that climate models were skewed in the direction of
underestimating the warming effect of carbon. The report reasoned that carbon emissions
have the potential to trigger many changes that amplify the warming effect—water absorbs
more sunlight than ice, humidity traps more heat, and so on—but few that would mitigate it.
The odds, they figure, are about one in three that temperatures will rise by 4.5 degrees C
2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 4 – TIPO B
(the top of the IPCC's range), but there's little chance at all that they'll rise by less than 2
degrees C. "We've had a hard time eliminating the possibility of very large climate
changes," says Roe. The answer is still couched in probabilities, but they've shifted in a
What can be done? Can a diplomatic miracle in Copenhagen save the planet
from the dreaded tipping point? Sea ice in the Antarctic was supposed to last for 5,000
years until scientists found that the melting was proceeding at a faster pace than expected.
Now it will all be gone in a mere 850 years. Bringing it back would require something like
10,000 years of cooler temperatures. Is there any way to halt the process before it goes too
No, says Susan Solomon, a climate scientist at the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colorado. In a recent study in the Proceedings of
the National Academies of Science, she found that most of the carbon we've already
released into the atmosphere will hang around for another 1,000 years. Even if world
leaders somehow managed to persuade everybody to stop driving cars and heating their
homes—bringing carbon emissions down to zero immediately—the Earth would continue to
warm for centuries. The effect of rising temperatures on rainfall patterns is also irreversible,
says Solomon. Parts of the world that tend to be dry (Mexico, north Africa, southern Europe
and the western parts of Australia and the United States) will continue to get drier, while
wet areas (the South Pacific islands, the horn of Africa) will keep getting wetter. "You have
to think of it as being like a dial that can only turn one way," she says. "We've cranked up
the dial, and we don't get to crank it back." The point of a climate treaty, then, isn't so much
to roll things back as to keep them from getting a whole lot worse—a worthy and important
goal, if not a particularly inspiring one.
If there's a silver lining to Solomon's findings, it's that she does not take into
account the possibility of one day being able to remove carbon from the atmosphere. Since
researchers around the world have only recently begun to ramp up projects on carbon capture and storage technology, the fix is wholly theoretical. Still, that's better than nothing.
(In: <http://www.newsweek.com/id/185822>. Access on: March 12, 2009)
01. Replace the words in bold by their synonyms. Use the following words:
HARVESTS – UNCERTAIN – HIDDEN – BETS
The truth is (A) shrouded by a big scientific unknown: how quickly does climate respond to changes in carbon levels? After 30 years of research, the link between the two is still imprecise. That's why temperature trends are expressed within wide confidence intervals. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the U.N. group, (B) puts the odds at two in three that a doubling of carbon levels in the atmosphere from pre-industrial levels would raise average temperatures anywhere from 2 degrees C to 4.5 degrees C. The difference between the top and bottom of this range, according to the 2007 report, spells the difference between bad and catastrophic. (Some scientists believe, for instance, that (C) crop yields decline 10 percent for each degree rise in temperature.) Where future generations wind up on the scale—or even if they fall on the scale at all—is still (D) a roll of the dice. A) ________________________________ B) ________________________________ C) ________________________________ D) _________________________________ 2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 4 – TIPO B 02. Complete the blanks with the following words or phrases according to the information
levels / centuries / Harvard / environmental / change / White House
A) John Holdren works at ________________________ and more recently also at the ________________________ as a science adviser. He warned that the ________________________ damage is about to become irreversible. B) Scientists do not know exactly how carbon dioxide ________________________ affect climate ________________________. C) David Battisti defends that it is necessary to collect data during ________________________ in order to get more precise information on global warming. 03. Write the names of: A) two parts of the world that are expected to get drier:
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
B) two parts of the world that are expected to get wetter:
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
04. Match the phrases with the appropriate equivalents. A) To go over the edge (title) ( ) to stay B) To stave off ( ) to revert C) To hang around (line 52) ( ) to reduce D) To bring down ( ) to go beyond a limit E) To crank back ( ) to prevent 2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 4 – TIPO B 05. Match the words in bold with their references. A) “Last year, they published an analysis […]” (lines 33-34) B) “The report reasoned that carbon emissions have the potential to trigger many C) “[…]but few that would mitigate it.” (line 37) D) “[…] they'll rise by less than 2 degrees C.” (lines 39-40)
( ) Climate scientists, Gerard Roe and Marcia Baker
06. Write T (true) or F (false): A) ______ Nowadays scientists have precise answers about global warming. B) ______ The text presents a pessimistic future for the climate and the C) ______ Global warming can be definitely reduced as long as we reduce carbon D) ______ Antarctic ice is now expected to be gone in less than 1000 years. E) ______ Scientists say that dry regions will become cooler with global warming. 2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 4 – TIPO B LÍNGUA PORTUGUESA E LITERATURA BRASILEIRA Questões de 07 a 12
Para resolver as questões 07 e 08, leia atentamente a tirinha apresentada a seguir.
07. A partir do que é apresentado na tirinha, que avaliação se pode fazer do Acordo
Ortográfico de 2009? Justifique sua resposta.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 4 – TIPO B 08. Leia o fragmento de texto apresentado a seguir.
“Cipro Neto conta uma história divertida. Num vagão de trem em Portugal, sentou-se à frente dele uma senhora que lia um tablóide policial intitulado O Crime. O professor leu e releu as manchetes – e não entendeu metade delas. Não por razões remotamente relacionadas à ortografia, claro, mas pelas expressões que, num texto de cunho popular, tornam o português lusitano quase estrangeiro para um brasileiro [.]”. (BOSCOV, I. “A última do português”. In: Revista Veja, ed. 2093, 31 dez. 08, p. 195) A) A história relatada no trecho acima funciona como argumento favorável ou
desfavorável à tese de que a Reforma Ortográfica de 2009 unificará a língua portuguesa? Justifique sua resposta.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
B) Pode-se afirmar que a palavra “claro”, no trecho transcrito acima, sinaliza o
posicionamento do autor sobre a Reforma Ortográfica de 2009? Por quê?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 4 – TIPO B 09. “As regras antigas eram difíceis, e as novas continuam a sê-lo. Ninguém sabia usar
o hífen e todos continuam sem sabê-lo.” (BOSCOV, I. “A última do português”. In: Revista Veja, ed. 2093, 31 dez. 08, p. 197). Identifique os termos ou as expressões a que se refere cada um dos pronomes destacados acima.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 4 – TIPO B
10. Leia os seguintes poemas de João Cabral de Melo Neto: O que o mar sim aprende do canavial: O que o mar sim ensina ao canavial: a elocução horizontal de seu verso: o avançar em linha rasteira da onda; a geórgica de cordel, ininterrupta, o espraiar-se minucioso, de líquido, narrada em voz e silêncio paralelos. alagando cova a cova onde se alonga. O que o mar não aprende do canavial: O que o canavial sim ensina ao mar: a veemência passional da preamar; a elocução horizontal de seu verso; a mão-de-pilão das ondas na areia, a geórgica de cordel, ininterrupta, moída e miúda, pilada do que pilar. narrada em voz e silêncio paralelos. O que o canavial sim aprende do mar: O que o mar não ensina ao canavial: o avançar em linha rasteira da onda; a veemência passional da preamar; o espraiar-se minucioso, de líquido, a mão-de-pilão das ondas na areia, alagando cova a cova onde se alonga. moída e miúda, pilada do que pilar. O que o canavial não aprende do mar: O que o canavial não ensina ao mar: o desmedido do derramar-se da cana; o desmedido do derramar-se da cana; o comedimento do latifúndio do mar, o comedimento do latifúndio do mar, que menos lastradamente se derrama. que menos lastradamente se derrama.
(MELO NETO, J. C. A educação pela pedra. Rio de Janeiro:Alfaguara, 2008, p.201, 211)
Explique o tipo de organização que une e distingue, ao mesmo tempo, os poemas “O mar e o canavial” e “O canavial e o mar”. ___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________
2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 2 – TIPO B 11. Explique as características do gênero teatral expresso no título da obra Auto da Compadecida e defina o papel da personagem Compadecida na peça de Ariano Suassuna.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 4 – TIPO B
12. Leia o trecho de “Sarapalha” apresentado a seguir.
“.Não adiantou ter sido tão direito. Se ele, Primo Argemiro, tivesse tido coragem. Se tivesse sido mais esperto. Talvez ela gostasse. Podia ter querido fugir com ele; o boiadeiro ainda não tinha aparecido. Agora, ela havia de se lembrar, achando que era um pamonha, um homem sem decisão. E, no entanto, viera para a fazenda só por causa dela. Primo Ribeiro não punha malícia em coisa nenhuma. Sim, os dois tinham sido bem tolos, só o homem de fora era quem sabia lidar com mulher!.” (ROSA, J. G. Sagarana. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 65. impr., 2001, p. 165)
No trecho citado, Primo Argemiro faz alusões a episódios decisivos de “Sarapalha”. Explique a relação entre os episódios mencionados e o desfecho do conto.
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009 GRUPO 2 – TIPO B 2º VESTIBULAR UFOP 2009
HEROIN® and ASPIRIN® The Connection! & The Collection! - Part I Dreser ( 1860-1924 ) a chemist, worked for Friedrich Bayer & Company, a dye factorywhen anything from the East was linked towould be developed. He had also negotiatedseafaring and exploring re-introduced thelaboratory Heinrich Dreser was responsibledrug in the late 15th and early 16th centuries. for the launch
Ottica sistemica, psicoterapia e psicofarmacologia L’ottica sistemica mi ha insegnato tantissime cose e di un paio ne parlo volentieri. Per prima cosa mi ha fatto sentire di essere parte del tutto. La seconda a non essere troppo fazioso e radicale: credo fermamente che questa ottica possa insegnare ad evitare dogmatismi e fondamentalismi. Come sappiamo il rapporto tra psicoterapia e psicof